The astounding untold history of money, currency, debt, and the Bank of Canada!



The single most important legal case of monetary reform in Canadian history is currently ongoing, though none of you will ever likely read anything in the morning newspaper or watch anything about it on television. While you will hear daily about interest rates being lowered… again, credit rating downgrades of major Canadian banks… again, and mortgage bubbles expanding… again. You will not remember hearing a singe peep about the Federal Court of Appeal’s hearing of COMER (The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform) vs. The Bank of Canada.

A case which argues the criminal conspiracy of private banks, loaning out OUR OWN currency to the government at a profit – at the expense of working taxpayers to cover the bill. The Bank of Canada (unlike the U.S. Federal Reserve for example) was at it’s creation a public bank, from which the government was able to take out loans at zero interest for public works and social projects. Shortly after a global shift away from real money into debt based currency in the early 1970s, our central bank became nothing more than another arm of a globalized new monetary system.

While I believe the aims of COMER, backed by a small grassroots group of educated citizens and nonpartisan economists is just. They simply do not understand the difference between currency and money. Their fight is true, but what they fail to understand is that the computerized transaction ledgers, account deposits, bank credit and cold hard cash that make up Canada’s national currency supply is NOT MONEY.

It is just numbers, made up out of thin air that we are all forced to transact in. Governments and international banks should not be in the business of currency creation, even at zero interest. You can not have true economic liberty when either government or banks have a monopoly on numbers printed on paper, and digits in a computer.

Money actually does have several universally agreed characteristics as a unit of account and medium of exchange. It must be durable, divisible, transportable, and fungible. While currency easily meets those requirements, money must also be a store of value over very long periods of time. That is only possible if the money has value in and of itself. True money should also be limited in quantity and have a long history of acceptance by the greatest number of people. It cannot be printed or created in the modern alchemist’s Pyrex beaker.

Precious metals are not just commodities, their natural properties makes them true money. They are the ONLY thing in nature that incorporates ALL the characteristics of sound money. The free market economies of Europe, North Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Central America have always known this. Time and time again, independently of each other they always selected gold and silver as money when ever it was available.

Since the dawn of human civilization at least 5,000 years ago precious metals have been in one way or another used as money or monetary jewellery. Silver stopped being circulated in 1964 when Canada followed the U.S. Mint’s debasement of their coinage into worthless pot metal. In fact the founding fathers of the United States wrote in the Coinage Act of 1792 that an American dollar can only be a weight of 0.77 troy ounces of pure silver. This debasement was not only unconstitutional, it was plain and simple criminal theft.

A few years later in 1971, with one flick of a pen gold stopped being the basis of U.S. paper currency and global economic energy. This was due to national leaders, namely Charles de Gaulle realizing the criminal fraud that America’s central bank was committing. Since WWII the vast majority of the world’s above ground gold supply was held in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This along with the gold confiscated from American citizens, that was allegedly held at Fort Knox gave value to the Federal Reserve’s paper.

Of course it goes without saying the Americans printed vastly more paper dollars than gold held in vaults. Charles de Gaulle started a bank run on gold, and the governments of Europe quickly caught on. The whole world wanted their physical gold back at the same time, and the U.S. could not repay it even in constitutional silver stolen in preparation a few years earlier. Practicality the entire world’s currency supply and markets at the time were backed by (or valued in) U.S. dollars, which would have self-destructed the entire planetary system on a fraudulent fractional reserve gold standard.

This is the first reason why Canadians do not use precious metals as public money anymore. The second reason is because without people demanding real money, international banksters have unlimited and uncontrollable power over absolutely everything and everyone. For the first time ever a completely new currency system backed by nothing but globally controlled debt was created. This is also exactly when the Bank of Canada was no longer owned by Canadians, or served our national interests.

Today this usury system is failing, just as predicted so long ago when it was created. The debt standard we use today was an emergency measure to temporarily bandage a fraudulent currency. Based on calculations it was not expected to survive more then fifty years, we now have an estimated six years left until we see an entirely different monetary system.

Repowering our central bank as a public Canadian institution will not help anymore, globalist policy to manage a universal currency reset has already been dictated. Although our polymer banknotes may look the same and we will still undoubtedly call it the dollar, it will be backed by a new global currency similar to the already grotesquely failing Euro. Today economists know it by the name “Special Drawing Rights”. Our currency availability, value and our standard of living will be determined solely by the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements via world governance.

Just before that happens though; the SECOND our current hocus pocus Ponzi scheme of quadrillion dollar derivatives and exponential growth (i.e., quantitative easing) collapses, you might be surprised how many people (both the 1%, and the debt/wage slaves) will instantaneously remember true money’s argent glow and golden glitter. Paper manipulators within the banking industry could be short squeezed by physical demand in worldwide gold and silver markets instantaneously. There is not that much deliverable bullion to cover a multinational currency run by the people, it could easily be all gone overnight.

Simply arresting the Rothschilds, and putting central banks back into the hands of the public will not fix this. It’s still only fiat; a simple unit of account yes, but NOT a safe store of the people’s economic energy. History repeats, all currency is only temporary until true money shines again!

“You know what a Fugazzi is? Faguzzi, fugazzi, it’s a whazzie, it’s a whoozie… it’s fairy dust. It doesn’t exist. It never landed. It’s not matter, it’s not on the elemental chart. It… it’s not f***ing real!” – Mark Hanna, The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

“A system of capitalism presumes sound money, not fiat money manipulated by a central bank. Capitalism cherishes voluntary contracts and interest rates that are determined by savings, not credit creation by a central bank.” – Ron Paul

“If you have faith in our leaders of commerce, don’t buy gold. If you do not have faith in them, maybe you should buy gold or silver.” – Robert Kiyosaki

“A disordered currency is one of the greatest political evils, in that it wars against our economy.” – Daniel Webster

Join Archbishop Dorian Baxter in His Righteous Crusade for Liberty:

Rally For Justice And To Bring Accountability   To The Children’s Aid Societies Of Canada!


This coming March 22nd., 2015 Archbishop Dorian A. Baxter B.A., O.T.C., M.Div. celebrates exactly 21 years since he made Canadian Legal history by becoming the first person to shatter the immunity of the Children’s Aid Society of Durham in particular and all Children’s Aid Societies across Canada. In that precedent-setting Judgement of March 22nd., 1994 (see Baxter V’s Durham CAS, Justice Somers) Justice Somers found the Durham CAS GUILTY of the grossest negligence, the grossest incompetence, malicious prosecution and blackmail!!!

Baxter founded NAPPA (The National Association for Public and Private Accountability) and Canada Court Watch ( immediately following this Judgement and is appalled to note that the Children’s Aid Societies of Canada appear to have learned nothing and continue to believe themselves to be above the Law!!! It is hoped that a minimum of 10,000 people will attend this unprecedented “Rally For Justice And To Bring Accountability To The Children’s Aid Societies Of Canada”!!! Details will be forthcoming re: current plans to establish the Rally at the end of May and people interested in assisting are asked to contact Archbishop Baxter in any of the following ways:

  1. Telephone: (289) 221-2687
  2. Facebook: “Dorian Arthur Baxter”
  3. E-mail:

Sincerely in Christ’s service,



500 Dawes Road

February 9, 2015


Editor’s note: We received a clearly scripted 5 minute voicemail message praising the “new” owners of 500 Dawes Road (lie) – and how wonderful the building is (lie), with countless happy residents (lie). Examples of the new management include putting up a sign asking people not to allow strangers into the building, and a sign asking residents to make use of the trash bin. As far as rats “some people brought them in as pets” the caller said, so it’s no wonder why they escaped into the walls and started breading. We even have a personal invitation to visit the superintendent, but we will ONLY accept if Janet Davis attends with us. Obviously the landlord’s deceit, and Janet Davis’ indifference never ends as this anonymous article proves:

I’m a resident of 500 Dawes Road, and have been for over 10 years. (Before Mrs. C. Krebs, aka C. Goodman, aka M. Litton took over the building and before the Human Rights Commission said they can no longer rent out to just adults.) The problem with the building started when the Harris Government closing down low rental housing and selling off the property to BIG developers. This is causing a major hosing shortage for low income family’s. Mrs. C. Krebs jumped on the band wagon and open the doors to 500 Dawes Road and 608 Dawes Road to low income family’s, then made a deal with the Federal Government to house immigrants at an inflated amount above the real rent.

We do have low income families in the building refusing to work, rather being on Ontario Works or O.D.S.P, and then we have the gang bangers and drug dealers. I must admit that Toronto Police’s gang unit, and drug squads have been very busy thanks to Mrs. Krebs (she use’s the Toronto Police Services as her personal security force). She also hires tenants from the Building to work around the building and property paying any where from $5.00 to $7.00 a hour when they are behind in there rent (due to the rental increases each year, more then they receive on Ontario Works.)

After a couple months she will have them evicted from the building, and have the door locks changed so they can not get their personal property. Then she has her staff clean out the unit. What is any good they split it up between them and the rest goes in the garbage. You can visit 79 St. Clair Avenue East, the Landlord and Tenant Board office and see how many tenants are on the list for eviction (last year there was one tenant in the court because of just 50 cents back rent). Several tenants are simply arrested by the police, and their unit is cleaned out within a week (mostly the drug dealer units). Today Mrs. C. Krebs has 10 units in court and had asked her assistant supervisor to lie for her. When he refused, Krebs got the new supervisor (who is on O.D.S.P.) on the stand.

As far the building maintenance Mrs. Krebs has been in and out of Courts Hearings, for over the past 10 years. At one hearing she was lying through her teeth regarding the heat in the building (500 Dawes Rd.) saying the heat was controlled by the weather and there was a unit on her roof that set the temperature for the building. Then she changed it to each unit has there own control for the heat (more perjury). The boilers were ordered to be replaced (never happened).

As for the fire in elevator, two employees were burnt very badly! One is in a wheel chair needing 24 hour care that was settled out of court. The second who still lives in the building (not able to work due to being burnt on his right side) was given the run around by Mrs. C. Krebs. First saying neither men were ever her employee, second telling him there would be a insurance adjuster getting in touch (which also never happened). The day of the fire Mrs. C. Krebs left the building right after the fire started, she went to the Ontario Social Services Office at Victoria Park and Eglinton and was found there by one of the tenants who stated to her “do you know the building is on fire?” Mrs. C. Krebs replayed yes, and waited two hours before returning to the building.

As for Janet Davis being here every year, yes that is true and even the former mayor Rob Ford has been here (editors note: video shows Mr. Ford was FAR more warmly welcomed). The city has put a lien on the Mortgage Payment from HavCare Investments account to do repairs if Mrs. C. Krebs refuse’s to carry out the work orders that have been placed against the building. Though, admittedly some of these orders date back 10 years.

Mrs. C. Krebs refuses to pay the interest on the last month’s deposit to any tenant stating they do not pay the increase, this not true. I have paid the increase every year and still never received a Cheque from her. Mrs. C. Krebs was ordered back in 2005 to pay each and every tenant their money for 5 years back interest. As for repairs in the units, you are better off doing them yourself. The whole place is below building code standards, any minor work is just a band-aid to keep the city happy.

A last word to those who wish to move DON’T! For the contractors that do work on this building or any other of the buildings she and her husband own, do not do it. You will NOT GET PAID! Yes the building has mice, rats, cockroaches and there are floors that are full of bed bugs. Every single crack head drug dealer in the area has their own keys to the building, though the tenants have to pay $25.00 for a front door key.

Yes, there are still some good tenants living here, they are the ones that have been here for the past 10 to 35 years or longer. If you do want to live here, Mrs. C. Krebs prefers cash rent payments so she does not have to declare it, and she can write the unit off as empty when tax time comes around.

If you want more information regarding the building go online to the City of Toronto’s Building Inspection page and take a visit to the courts/hearings, she just may throw a tantrum fit for you in public. Or just visit the building and talk with some of the tenants.


                 How do we ensure that when one government abuses its power, we don’t have to live with the consequences for a generation? Through the supremacy of our democratically elected legislative assembly in Ontario.

                 In 2009, the Ontario Liberals misused their majority when they stripped municipalities of their long-standing land planning rights in order to impose the wind turbine experiment. They then used executive orders to hand out sole-sourced deals ‎to line the pockets of their wind developer friends. These 20-year deals provide guaranteed pricing to developers for wind power that is above market rates—because wind power cannot be produced in Ontario at reasonable market rates. They also guarantee revenue even when turbines are asked not to produce wind power.

The Ontario Liberals deliberately ignored the interests and wishes of rural Ontario and made all consumers, both urban and rural pay for it—to the tune of $1 billion to $3 billion annually, with increases projected every year. That’s $20 billion to $60 billion over the next two decades. This accounted for only 3.4% of Ontario’s electricity generating capacity, but represented 20% of the total commodity cost of electricity in the province.

And the bad news doesn’t end there—for the last two years, our electricity system has been forced to dump more than double the amount of power generated by wind turbines into other jurisdictions, and at a 75% discount on what we paid to produce it.

Why? Because we are producing more electricity than we need, and because the wind turbines in Ontario produce most of their power during off-peak hours – when we don’t need it all.

And how are the turbines helping the environment? Since wind power is unreliable it requires additional backup power from other generation sources, such as gas-fired generation, which—you guessed it—increases air emissions.

France, Belgium, Italy, and Spain have all had to reverse course on wind power. The reason – the exorbitant costs on consumers with no benefit.

So how do we get out of this mess? If a future government issued another executive order to terminate the McGuinty-Wynne wind power scheme and keep it out of public view, then taxpayers would be on the hook for the entirety of the commitments – as was done by Dalton McGuinty in 2010 with the proposed power plants in Mississauga and Oakville. If, however, the democratically elected legislature passed an explicit statute to end the wind power rip-off, Ontario could determine what compensation, if any, would be paid, and to whom.

Enacting legislation to repeal the Liberal wind power boondoggle is the right way forward. As Premier I will do just that and introduce measures in the legislature to correct this abuse of power by the Ontario Liberals.

Visit to learn more about McNaughton’s plan to end Ontario’s wind energy experiment, and other issues that are part of his plan for Ontario.

Monte McNaughton is the MPP for Lambton-Kent-Middlesex and a candidate for the leadership of the PC Party of Ontario.



February 9, 2015


For a variety of reasons, identified below, many Toronto Private Property Rights (TPPRA), members, including myself, have refused the imposition of “smart” water meters in their homes. In response, we have been threatened with:

-Having our water service discontinued;
-The imposition of fines of up to $50,000;
-Legacy fees of $1,000 per year; &

Additional payments of $240 per year. I was even told over the phone, in an ominous tone, that I would be put on “the list.”

Private property rights: As you are undoubtedly aware, Canadians, including Toronto residents, enjoy private property rights, as identified by the Canadian Bill of Rights (reproduced, below).
the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
Given that Canadians possess the indefeasible right to the enjoyment of property, it is unclear to TPPRA by what due process of law we are being deprived of it.

Privacy: In addition to the enjoyment of property, Canadians enjoy the common-law right to privacy. The imposition of “smart” water meters in our homes violates our right to privacy. Furthermore, it is unclear to TPPRA why Toronto Water needs to collect water usage data 4 times a day, when residents are billed 3 times a year. It is not the government’s business when and how much water individual households use on a daily basis. Not only do “smart” water meters violate Canadian’s right to privacy, TPPRA is concerned that this data could be easily hacked and used to identify the daily habits of residents, which information would be useful to criminals. Toronto Water’s assertion that their system is secure is belied by the numerous hacking incidents of government agencies and government controlled corporations which have been reported over the last several years.
Also, the by-law that delegates authority to Toronto Water to impose “smart” water meters, also delegates Toronto Water the authority to enter homes without a search warrant, for any reason whatsoever, i.e., if the household uses less water than usual, uses more water than usual or the pattern of water use changes. This is absurd. Police need to show probable cause to obtain a search warrant, prior to entering a home. Apparently, all Toronto Water needs is to impose a spy meter in your home and use the information relayed to it as an excuse to enter.

Program support: TPPRA members do not remember any municipal politician campaigning on and being given a mandate to violate Torontonian’s right to privacy and private property rights, i.e., to impose “smart” water meters. It has been suggested by Toronto Water that a large percentage of residents support the imposition of “smart” water meters as evidenced by the high rate of compliance. TPPRA respectfully disagrees with this assertion, as we maintain that compliance – in the face of threats by Toronto Water of $50,000 fines for non-compliance – does not equal support for the program. In fact, some of our members who vehemently oppose the “smart” water meter program surrendered to Toronto Water and had meters installed in their homes under protest as they were afraid of being financially destroyed.

Due Diligence: TPPRA submits that Toronto Water has not done its due diligence with respect to assessing the health risks associated with “smart” water meters. In our opinion, public health issues have not been thoroughly investigated, as asserted by Toronto Water, as the City of Toronto’s Public Health Department has not undertaken any actual physical testing of the smart water meters, but has instead relied on the manufacturer’s assertion in its literature that RFs are emitted from the units only during data transmission. Even after relying on the manufacturer’s assertion, Public Health has only been able to determine that “smart” water meters are “unlikely” to pose a risk to human health. Given that “smart” water meters are installed inside homes, “unlikely” is not a high enough standard when it comes to the health of our families.

Fire hazard: Ontario’s Fire Marshal has identified that smart meters were linked to 23 incidents in Ontario from 2011 – 2013. “I can tell you 10 of those were smart meter failures attributed to internal faults, and 13 were small fires attributed to high-resistance heating,” said spokeswoman Carol Gravelle.

In August 2014 SaskPower announced plans to remove all 105,000 of its smart meters and replace them with traditional units, after a number of smart meters caught fire.
TPPRA has grave concerns with respect to the safety of these devices, as it is our understanding that fire risk is inherent in the design of all “smart” meters, not just specific makes and models.

Health/Radio Frequencies: Many TPPRA members suffer adverse health impacts due to exposure to RFs. Woman’s College Hospital officially recognizes electromagnetic sensitivity as a health condition and trains doctors to recognize it. Exposing people, who are currently suffering from electromagnetic sensitivity, to additional RFs within their homes, will only exacerbate their ongoing health problems. TPPRA does not believe that it is the proper role of government to harm the health of residents against their will.

Economics/efficacy: Given the recently released scathing provincial Auditor General’s report concerning the massive failure of the provincial governments smart electricity meter program, which identified that the costs of the program far outweigh the benefits, and the provincial Ombudsman’s ongoing investigation of the complete lack of efficacy of Hydro One’s smart meter program and its resulting abysmal billing system failures, we do not buy-in to Toronto Water’s assertion that the “smart” water meters are accurate or that the program will save the City of Toronto money in the long-run.

Conclusion: TPPRA submits that threatening and bullying residents is not the appropriate role of government in a free society. TPPRA members have not violated anyone’s rights by opting out of the government’s surveillance-control grid. In fact, we are defending and protecting our common-law rights and freedoms, specifically our right to privacy and our private property rights.
TPPRA believes that we can come to a mutually acceptable agreement with the City of Toronto and we are eager to enter into discussions as soon as possible, in an effort to de-escalate the situation.

Yours in liberty,
Jessica Lauren Annis

Politicians vs. Prostitutes
by Bahman Yazdanfar


Question: Who do you have to respect more: prostitutes or career politicians? Answer: You must pay more respect to street prostitutes than career politicians, since there are number of differences in conduct between the two:

·     Prostitutes stick to their word, deliver what they agreed to on the budget that was discussed, at the time of the negotiation; but career politicians sign contracts without thinking, and always ask for much more, and deliver much less, if at all!

·     Prostitutes get paid to be screwed. Career politicians get paid to do the job, but at the end, they are the ones who screw you!

·     Prostitutes will return your money if they choose to cancel their agreement, but career politicians make you pay even more, when they choose and/or fail to deliver!

·     Prostitutes provide you with temporary pleasure for your money and time, but career politicians generate so many complications, giving you permanent misery!

·     Prostitutes cannot operate freely without consequences, but career politicians can do what they want, without any accountability!

·     Prostitutes respect the space of their colleagues, but career politicians stab anyone in the back to get ahead!

·     Prostitutes don’t meddle in politics, but career politicians make prostitution their number one priority. They constantly pass laws to put prostitutes out of business! Ironically, many of these career politicians bring a large portion of business to prostitutes using tax dollars!

·     Prostitutes never ask for extra to cover their business expenses, but career politicians make you pay for their perks!

·     Prostitutes insist on using protection to guard their customers, but career politicians do whatever they want, passing the consequences of their own recklessness to the public!

·     Prostitutes treat their customers well, hoping for repeat business. Career politicians don’t give a damn about the people who elect and pay them, because repeat business is always guaranteed!

·     Prostitutes didn’t get to this industry by choice, but career politicians did!


Did you ever imagine what you could do if you could disappear? You may not have to imagine any longer. Attempts to hide in plain sight have made great advancements, but new methods of doing so are absolutely mind-blowing. The ‘mimic’ octopus and some cuttlefish transform the color and shape of their bodies to match the background behind them. This feature makes them nearly impossible to see, protecting them from being attacked by other marine life. The effect is the same as ‘invisibility’, but different principles are being used by researchers to make humans impossible to see.

The method used by some inventors is being called the Rochester Cloak. This technique can be illustrated in an experiment requiring four lenses of different strengths placed in the perfect distance from each other. There is a mathematical equation which is way beyond our scope. Anyway, the objective is to make you invisible from all angles.

We know that light can be interrupted, reflected, refracted and bent. This discovery has light bending around the individual and projecting a perfect reproduction of what is behind him or her on to the front, wherever that may be at that moment. It works even if you are in motion. The “picture” moves relative to the sight-line. After we tried to find out more about this optical technology, a scientist recalled hearing that it is being done with beads of glass, but he didn’t know any more about it. Iraqis have reported experiencing this phenomenon and having film of a U.S. soldier reappearing as he jumped on to a tank, but that is clearly impossible to confirm.

We found a source that knew quite a bit about this subject and couldn’t stop talking. He spoke freely about glass beads only 50 microns wide. Specializing in optics, the professor spoke about polymers, metamaterials, negative refraction index, and arrays of tiny mirrors. We didn’t understand hardly a word. He had never studied ‘cloaking’, but was actually amazed at the idea.

Is there a material that can deliver invisibility? Is three-dimensional, continuous multi-directional ‘cloaking’ now available? Certainly not to the public as of yet. The many possible applications go way beyond just scaring the crap out of your buddies. Could optical cloaking allow a surgeon to see through his hands while operating? Or make the blind spot on a vehicle see-through? Can we imagine paint with this property that could be applied to many types of surfaces? Do we even dare imagine the military uses?

Cloaking technology is advancing in leaps and bounds. I have dreamed about invisibility since seeing the movie The Invisible Man starring Claude Rains and reading the book by H.G. Wells. Your Ward News is going to dig deeper to find this material that may or may not exist. We hope to find it…

See Ya!… Maybe?